- Preliminary position - ACCC Preliminary view
- Submissions - on ACCC preliminary view
- Submissions - Murraylink submission and response to ACCC preliminary view
- Supporting information - Correspondence on undergrounding
- Consultant reports - ACCC Consultant's report
- Submissions - Correspondence on spares and other issues
- Submissions - Murraylink response to correspondence
Preliminary position - ACCC Preliminary view
Back to topOn 14 May 2003, the ACCC released its Preliminary View in relation to its assessment of MTC's application.
The ACCC's Preliminary View draws on MTC's application, consultancy reports on the application of the regulatory test, Murraylink's power transfer capability, and operations and maintenance expenditure, submissions from interested parties, information presented to the ACCC during the course of its deliberations, and the ACCC's's own analysis.
| Documents (1) | Author |
|---|---|
| AER - Preliminary view - 14 May 2003 ( PDF 1.81 MB ) |
Submissions - on ACCC preliminary view
Back to topSubmissions - Murraylink submission and response to ACCC preliminary view
Back to top| Documents (3) | Author |
|---|---|
| Murraylink response to submissions - economic issues - 8 April 2003 ( PDF 1.68 MB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |
| Murraylink response to submissions - 8 April 2003 ( PDF 2.41 MB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |
| Murraylink submission on ACCC preliminary view - 18 July 2003 ( PDF 3.11 MB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |
Supporting information - Correspondence on undergrounding
Back to topAs part of Murraylink Transmission Company’s (MTC) regulatory test assessment, it selected and assessed six alternative projects, four of which were network options. As part of its assessment of the cost of the alternative projects it identified varying needs for undergrounding the transmission lines.
As a result, the ACCC sought the views of the Department of Sustainability and Environment with regard to the extent, if any, to which undergrounding of transmission lines is necessary in the areas for which the proposed alternatives traverse, and the assessment process that the Department of Sustainability and Environment would undertake with regard to the location of electricity transmission lines.
In response the ACCC received a letter from the Department of Sustainability and Environment outlining their view. A number of responses were also received in response to the Department of Sustainability and Environment letter.
Consultant reports - ACCC Consultant's report
Back to top| Documents (1) | Author |
|---|---|
| PB Associates - report on opex alternative 3 - 25 August 2003 ( PDF 27.5 KB ) | PB Associates |
Submissions - Correspondence on spares and other issues
Back to topThe ACCC received various correspondence and submissions from interested parties on spares and other issues.
| Documents (4) | Author |
|---|---|
| ElectraNet SA - letter to AER on spares and SVC ( PDF 102.31 KB ) | ElectraNet |
| Murraylink- response to ElectraNet SA letter ( PDF 348.07 KB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |
| ESIPC - submissions on spares ( PDF 68.91 KB ) | Electricity Supply Industry Planning Council (ESIPC) |
| Murraylink - response to ESIPC submission ( PDF 285.61 KB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |
Submissions - Murraylink response to correspondence
Back to top| Documents (1) | Author |
|---|---|
| Murraylink - response to submissions ( PDF 284.25 KB ) | Murraylink Transmission Company |